Women with guns a growing phenomenon


PDA
Sir Knight
04-01-2007, 09:37 PM
http://www.insidebayarea.com/sanmateocountytimes/ci_5555670 ... ARMED and FEMALE
Women with guns a growing phenomenon
By Christine Morente, STAFF WRITER


SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO - KIMBERLY SHRUM grips a Smith & Wesson .357 Magnum revolver and aims at a target 25 yards away.

Bang.

A hot shell casing hits the floor, joining hundreds of others littering the concrete at Jackson Arms Indoor Shooting Range in South San Francisco.

Shrum centers herself and aims again.

Bang.

After two days using her new revolver, Shrum's hands are sore from the recoil of every shot.

"I get that rush and power from a Magnum," said the 36-year-old Millbrae resident. "I've taken archery and thrown darts, but shooting is another way to hurl something through the air. But this is just like shooting a paper ball into the trash can. TwoPoints. Air ball."

She is among a growing number of women who are showing up at shooting ranges across the country. Many women who visit the Jackson Arms shooting gallery do it because they love the power of guns and want to learn how to protect themselves.

While there are no hard figures on the number of women who own guns, it's estimated that nationwide 11 million to 17 million women wield firearms, said Laura Browder, author of "Her Best Shot: Women and Guns in America." The National Rifle Association doesn't keep figures by gender.

Browder said the gun industry is just as focused on females as it has been over the last 200 years, but the marketing strategy now taps into their fears.

"The gun industry is saying, 'Look, the state is not here to protect you, the cops are
Advertisement
not here, no one is looking out for you,'" said Browder, who is assistant professor of English at Virginia Commonwealth University. "There's a lot of single mothers, and there's a lot of suggestion there is no man in the house, and the woman has got to take care of herself."

That's a far cry from earlier ads that depict women as rifle-toting cowgirls and snarling buxom blondes cradling a machine gun. Meanwhile, women such as Annie Oakley, Bonnie Parker — as in "Bonnie and Clyde" — and Patty Hearst are still revered as armed female icons.

But Browder adds that women fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan are adding a more sobering image of women and guns.

"Many, many women are in combat and coming home wounded," Browder said. "Women with guns will seem less exotic than they once did."

Liza Normandy, a certified NRA firearm instructor at Jackson Arms, teaches women to properly shoot guns. Classes cost $50.

She said she would like to have more female shooters come in. To attract the group, Jackson Arms offers Ladies Night on Mondays. The cost of a lane for an hour is $7 instead of the regular $14 price.

Those who practice in the gallery are largely either police cadets or women who accompany their boyfriends or husbands.

Normandy has been shooting on and off for 16 years. She and her husband — they met on Lane 7 at Jackson Arms — are very passionate about the recreational sport.

"Shooting is like any hobby as bowling or golf," Normandy said. "It's a great way to release aggression."

Range Master Leo Manalo also teaches ladies' classes. One day, he taught a grandmother and her two granddaughters.

"Women get into shooting just like the guys do," he said. "Because it's like a mini-vacation. It's a lot cheaper than seeing a therapist. It's relaxing."

To own a firearm in California, you need to show proof of residency within the state, and pass a 30-question test to get a handgun-safety certificate. The waiting period is 10 days.

Kimberly Shrum bought her Magnum revolver on Sunday, after shooting for three months. Her father, an ex-Marine, taught her how to handle a .45-caliber semi-automatic pistol.

She said she's addicted to the power.

"Once you hold the gun in your hand and channel the power right where you want it, it's such a rush," said Shrum, who is an office manager for a financial services company in San Bruno. "But I will never get comfortable with a handgun."

Sabrina Watts, 24, is a cadet at the College of San Mateo's Police Academy. The Redwood City resident was practicing at Jackson Arms with a fellow cadet on Monday. Both used to be officers for the Peninsula Humane Society.

Watts calls herself a good shooter, but needs to stop anticipating the bang, which throws off her aim. She started shooting when she was 9 years old and learned that "guns are fun."

Watts, who plans to eventually become a police officer, believes a woman should arm herself.

"Regardless of how strong you are, a man can overpower you," she said. "If you need to protect your home, you have to do what you have to do." "KIMBERLY SHRUM grips a Smith & Wesson .357 Magnum revolver and aims at a target 25 yards away. Bang. A hot shell casing hits the floor"

... Hmmmm -- a revolver that spits out an empty shell casing every time it is fired? :rolleyes: Never seen a design like that.

If you enjoyed reading about "Women with guns a growing phenomenon" here in the FamilyFriendsFirearms.com archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join FamilyFriendsFirearms.com today for the full version!
Popeye
04-01-2007, 09:44 PM
Except for the green highlighted ignorance at the beginning, it is a refreshing article.

Note the byline

IamRose
04-01-2007, 09:47 PM
Not excatly an informend writer, eh?

eljay
04-01-2007, 09:47 PM
Good point. But then, that's the news media these days.

My wife doesn't talk about the "rush of power" from shooting. She talks about hitting what she's shooting at. When we used to shoot in handgun competition at the local club, it drove the men crazy. She's a good shot. Can out-shoot me in some circumstances. She now shoots for practice, as she carries. Again, nothing about "power she feels with a gun in her hand", just to hit what she's aiming at. Of course, we live in Texas, which a lot of folks in the northeast think is still frontier. :)

gmcfixer
04-01-2007, 09:54 PM
My wife has shoot for years, after meeting me she learned to shoot much better but always had it and just needed the right person to get it out of her. Thing is the person writting the article did make a major mistake but if it gets more women shooting then so be it.

Dave Z

Zen900
04-01-2007, 10:37 PM
Good point. But then, that's the news media these days.

My wife doesn't talk about the "rush of power" from shooting. She talks about hitting what she's shooting at. When we used to shoot in handgun competition at the local club, it drove the men crazy. She's a good shot. Can out-shoot me in some circumstances. She now shoots for practice, as she carries. Again, nothing about "power she feels with a gun in her hand", just to hit what she's aiming at. Of course, we live in Texas, which a lot of folks in the northeast think is still frontier. :)

Yea I don't get the power thingy nor do I plink to relieve aggression. Shooting is like any other hobby. In fact the most fun part of gun ownership is working on them. That relaxes me in the same way as reading a good book does. I don't read to relieve aggression.

wilkerson
04-01-2007, 11:46 PM
i can't remember anyone saying they shoot because they love the power. sounds like the writers silly idea of why she thinks someone would enjoy shooting.

ExSniper
04-02-2007, 07:31 AM
Most men may not talk about the "rush of power," but we do enjoy the feeling. Look at the sales figures for .357 Mag, .44 Mag, .500 S&W, etc. Check out any gun forum and look at the debates about "minimum" power levels for defensive loads. Look at the always popular "real men carry pistols whose caliber starts with 4." Plinking with .22s is fun but most of us crave "More Power!"
Too bad this author does not know the difference between a revolver and an autoloader. Errors like that make the whole article less effective for anyone who knows even a little about guns.

iso1
04-02-2007, 08:09 AM
This is more than just a misinformed writer or a case of a simple mistake.

This is deliberate deception, a planned falsehood slipped in as truth.

How so?

Well, the writer's opening lines make it seem as if she were there. If she were there, she would have seen that no "hot shell casing hits the floor" after the revolver was fired.

This leads us to one of two possible conclusions:

1. The writer actually was present, yet deliberately lied to her readers about the way a revolver functions.

2. The writer was not actually present, yet deliberately leads her readers to assume that she was present. An indirect lie, but a lie nonetheless.

I also noticed that the article is cleverly worded to paint a negative picture of firearms owners as power hungry, violent, criminally inclined (Bonnie Parker and Patty Hearst? Remember them?) and incompetent people, and gun dealers and manufacturers as entities which prey on the fears of women. And it's done in such a way as to not arouse the ire of Second Amendment supporters, ala Zumbo.

And, it seems to have worked.

Rookie_Rover
04-02-2007, 08:17 AM
Aside from the blatant gun ignorance, it was a good article.

About shooting big-bores for the power; I don't think it is so much the power, but the ability of the big-bores. Let the small bore advocates go on all they wish, but there is no way a .25 ACP can compete with the .45 ACP. It just doesn't cut the mustard on paper or on the range.

Recoil in the hand, and power on tap is just a side effect of having a capable cartridge...

kaleidescope
04-02-2007, 09:40 AM
Great catches of the propaganda, gentlemen!:up:

If you enjoyed reading about "Women with guns a growing phenomenon" here in the FamilyFriendsFirearms.com archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join FamilyFriendsFirearms.com today for the full version!